| Author |
 Topic  |
|
justme
Advanced Member
1131 Posts |
 Posted - 12/14/2008 : 09:13:27 AM
|
That may be so but Arthur has said it's fact. I'm asking he either prove it, or restate it as his opinion or speculation.
|
 |
|
|
massdee
Moderator
4242 Posts |
Posted - 12/14/2008 : 09:26:47 AM
|
You are right, we need to be careful how we word our posts, fact, opinion or speculation. If it's fact the posters should share where he is getting his facts from.
Like you, I am still not pleased about receiving that email. It really ticked me off. |
|
|
|
Tails
Administrator
1756 Posts |
Posted - 12/14/2008 : 11:06:05 AM
|
I would love to see proof that Janice Vetrano is behind the whole thing. None of this takes me away from the matters at hand. I know that Pity Hall (which belongs to the citizens of Everett) is in disarray, very few know what the heck they are doing, the spending is at an alarming rate and instead of decreasing the budget, we increased it yet again. I'm not speaking of fixed costs and I understand things increase but the main goal (I thought) in the beginning was to take the budget, look to see where cuts can be made and reduce it for the taxpayers.
What we have done is illegal consolidations (per the state) off the chart salaries for friends and make excuses to get other friends in the cash funnel. We hire a lawyer from the firm that represents William Thibeault (and his ethics can be challenged in court) and she's the "Purchasing Agent"??? I see where the dots are connecting.
As it was already stated.....we need SOMEONE in there that can fix this mismanagement. If people allow it another two years, you might as well have Jay Ash stretch Chelsea right over Everett and become one.
Did the city of Everett get billed for those shrubs on the rotary that is state property? |
Edited by - Tails on 12/14/2008 12:08:49 PM |
|
|
|
massdee
Moderator
4242 Posts |
Posted - 12/14/2008 : 8:36:05 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by massdee
I find it quite deceiving that your group has sent out unsigned emails to personal email addresses. If you received these addresses from people we know then that person should have signed their name. I will be emailing everyone on my contact list and ask which of them gave out my address. Your actions, has succeeded in creating many negative feelings and I truly feel this was an invasion of privacy. I, personally, give no merit to a group that will not sign their name. I am also disappointed in Alderman Van Campens answer to this.
I just want to update this. I did in fact email all my contacts, except one, an elected official. I have heard back from all of them and none of them gave my email address out to anyone. That only leaves one person, the elected official. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
check this out
